Comments on: 9/12 demonstration a record DC turnout: National Park Service

By: Martin

Martin — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:01:24 +0000

>>>Posted by pato’ on September 16, 2009 at 1:

>>>In the interest of accuracy, you should know that this item is 100 percent incorrect as far as the National Park Service is concerned.

>>>1) There is no such person as “Dan Bana” in the Park Service. Someone mis-copied the name of “Dave Barna,” head spokesman for the Park Service.

>>>2) Although Mr. Barna actually DID say those words, he did NOT say them about the 9/12 march.Someone incorrectly attributed his quote, which he actually made LAST JANUARY, when he was interviewed about the turnout . . . for . . . President Obama’s inauguration.

Very unfortunate for our nation that the National Park Service, a taxpayer funded organization, will not publish their estimates on their website. At least, I couldn’t find it. So the pundits argue back and forth over whether it was 10000 or 1.7 million.

By: Karen

Karen — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:40:45 +0000

The mob was so angry they picked up their trash? The difference between the 9/12 people and those at the inauguration is that the protesters believe in taking care of themselves and not having someone else do their work for them. Go 9/12ers and Tea Party Patriots!

By: pato'

pato' — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:08:10 +0000

In the interest of accuracy, you should know that this item is 100 percent incorrect as far as the National Park Service is concerned.

1) There is no such person as “Dan Bana” in the Park Service. Someone mis-copied the name of “Dave Barna,” head spokesman for the Park Service.

2) Although Mr. Barna actually DID say those words, he did NOT say them about the 9/12 march.Someone incorrectly attributed his quote, which he actually made LAST JANUARY, when he was interviewed about the turnout . . . for . . . President Obama’s inauguration.